Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Design-related losses of double-fishnet negative-index photonic metamaterials

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

The literature regarding the influence of the hole shape on the performance, especially on the losses, of negative-index metamaterials on the basis of the so-called double-fishnet structure is unclear. We investigate this aspect in a systematic theoretical study showing that the figure of merit can differ by as much as a factor of 2.5 between rectangular and circular holes, respectively.

©2007 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Bi-anisotropy of multiple-layer fishnet negative-index metamaterials due to angled sidewalls

Zahyun Ku, Jingyu Zhang, and S. R. J. Brueck
Opt. Express 17(8) 6782-6789 (2009)

Negative beam displacements from negative-index photonic metamaterials

G. Dolling, M.W. Klein, M. Wegener, A. Schädle, B. Kettner, S. Burger, and S. Linden
Opt. Express 15(21) 14219-14227 (2007)

Exploiting the dispersion of the double-negative-index fishnet metamaterial to create a broadband low-profile metallic lens

B. Orazbayev, V. Pacheco-Peña, M. Beruete, and M. Navarro-Cía
Opt. Express 23(7) 8555-8564 (2015)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (1)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Comparison of rectangular, square, and circular-shaped holes in double-layer fishnet structures. The three columns represent the three hole shapes, which are indicated on the top. The polarization configuration is also shown on the top. The rows below show the real and imaginary parts of the retrieved effective electric permittivity ε, the magnetic permeability µ, the refractive index n, and the resulting figure of merit FOM=-Re(n)/Im(n). The parameters for rectangular holes wx =316nm, wy =100nm, and a=600nm correspond to those of Ref. [4]. The best parameters that we have found here for square-shaped holes are wx =wy =w=319nm and a=625nm; for circular holes r=192nm and a=625nm. The vertical layer thicknesses are kept fixed for all three hole shapes: 45nm Ag (gray), 30nm MgF2 (blue), and 45nm Ag (gray).

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1. FOM of circular-hole double-fishnet negative-index photonic metamaterials obtained by embedding the structure in an effective homogeneous medium with refractive index n= 1.1 (i.e., no glass substrate). The FOMvalues in brackets refer the corresponding calculations for structures in air (n=1) on a glass substrate with refractive index n=1.5. The thickness of the spacer layer increases from s=30nm in the top to s=100nm in the bottom row. The metal thickness t=45nm is fixed. To keep a fixed vacuum wavelength λ=1.4µm, the lattice constant a, and the hole radius r have to be adjusted. The column labeled λ/a refers to the ratio of vacuum wavelength and lattice constant. The column to the right refers to the corresponding ratio for the material wavelength λ/n) in the embedding medium with refractive index n= 1.1 (glass substrate with refractive index n=1.5).

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.