Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Finite checkerboards of dissipative negative refractive index

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

The electromagnetic properties of finite checkerboards consisting of alternating rectangular cells of positive refractive index (ε=+1, μ=+1) and negative refractive index (ε=-1, μ=-1) have been investigated numerically. We show that the numerical calculations have to be carried out with very fine discretization to accurately model the highly singular behaviour of these checkerboards. Our solutions show that, within the accuracy of the numerical calculations, the focussing properties of these checkerboards are reasonably robust in the presence of moderate levels of dissipation. We also show that even small systems of checkerboards can display focussing effects to some extent.

©2006 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Negative refractive index in optics of metal-dielectric composites

Alexander V. Kildishev, Wenshan Cai, Uday K. Chettiar, Hsiao-Kuan Yuan, Andrey K. Sarychev, Vladimir P. Drachev, and Vladimir M. Shalaev
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 23(3) 423-433 (2006)

High-frequency homogenization for checkerboard structures: defect modes, ultrarefraction, and all-angle negative refraction

Richard V. Craster, Julius Kaplunov, Evgeniya Nolde, and Sebastien Guenneau
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28(6) 1032-1040 (2011)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. A pair of complementary checkerboard layers with ε=±1 and μ=±1. Positive and negative refractive index are schematically depicted by white and coloured regions. A ray can be transmitted with no change in direction or retro- reflected.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. The transmission and reflection coefficients for a pair of complementary checker-board layers with ε=±1 and μ=±1. (a) and (b) are the results for inadequate differencing with 202 points across d, while (c) and (d) are the results for better differencing with 262 points across d.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. The transmittivity and reflectivity for dissipative checkerboard systems with ε=μ=-1+i0.1 (top panel) and a silver checkerboard with ε=-1+i0.4 and μ=+1 everywhere (bottom panel). Resonant excitation of surface plasmon modes at subwavelength kx can be seen for the silver checkerboard.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Left panel: P-polarized eigenfield associated with a line source of wavelength 0.5d (d is about 9µm in section 3) placed at a distance 0.2d from a silver checkerboard slab consisting of 30 cells of side length 0.1d, alternating air and weakly dissipative silver cells (ε=-1+i0.01 and μ=+1). The scale on the right is in arbitrary units. (a) 2D plot of the field; (c) Profile of the field computed along a vertical segment with endpoints (0, 1)d and (0,-1)d. Right panel: Same with two pairs of complementary checkerboard layers (60 cells); (b) 2D plot of the field; (d) 3D plot of the field.

Equations (6)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

𝒯 ( k x ) = 1 , 𝓡 ( k x ) = 0 ,
ω 2 ( k ) = c 2 ε μ a 2 4 sin 2 ( 1 2 k a ) c 2 ε μ k 2 [ 1 1 12 ( k a ) 2 ] ,
k 2 = ε μ ω 2 c 2 [ 1 + 1 12 ( k a ) 2 ] ,
δ μ = μ k 2 a 2 12 ,
k x t = ln ( δ μ 2 ) = ln ( k x 2 a 2 24 )
w e = λ i λ j λ j λ i
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.