Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Imaging in digital holographic microscopy

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We present a theoretical formalism for three dimensional (3D) imaging properties of digital holographic microscopy (DHM). Through frequency analysis and visualization of its 3D optical transfer function, an assessment of the imaging behavior of DHM is given. The results are compared with those from other types of interference microscopy. Digital holographic microscopy does not result in true 3D imaging. The main advantage of holographic microscopy lies in its quick acquisition of a single 2D image. Full 3D imaging can be obtained with DHM using a broad-band source or tomographic reconstruction.

©2007 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Simultaneous two-color imaging in digital holographic microscopy

Nicola E. Farthing, Rachel C. Findlay, Jan F. Jikeli, Pegine B. Walrad, Martin A. Bees, and Laurence G. Wilson
Opt. Express 25(23) 28489-28500 (2017)

Real-time dual-wavelength digital holographic microscopy with a single hologram acquisition

Jonas Kühn, Tristan Colomb, Frédéric Montfort, Florian Charrière, Yves Emery, Etienne Cuche, Pierre Marquet, and Christian Depeursinge
Opt. Express 15(12) 7231-7242 (2007)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (8)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. 3D Spatial frequency cutoffs in holographic microscopy for (a) transmission mode, and (b) reflection mode. m and s are normalized spatial frequencies in transverse and axial directions respectively as defined in section 3.2.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Spatial frequency cutoffs in interference microscopes for (a) conventional interference, and (b) confocal interference.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Spatial frequency cutoffs in holographic microscope for an on-axis configuration (a) and an off-axis configuration (b).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Basic configuration of the DHM in (a) transmission or (b) reflection mode. BS1, BS2, beam splitters; M1, M2, mirrors; MO, microscope objective; S, sample.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. CTF for holographic microscope at α 0 = π/3 for (a) transmission and (b) reflection mode.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Spatial frequency cutoffs of low-coherence holographic microscope with a range of k numbers from k2 to k1 in (a) transmission and (b) reflection mode.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. Low-coherence CTF for holographic reflection microscope with (a) Gaussian gating and (b) gating using the modified spectral distribution at α 0 = π/3.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. Spatial frequency coverage representation through tomography. (a) rotation of illumination (b) rotation of object.

Equations (13)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

t ( r ) = O ( r ) + R ( r ) 2
= O ( r ) 2 + R ( r ) 2 + O ( r ) R * ( r ) + O * ( r ) R ( r ) ,
h ( v , u ) = 0 α 0 P ( θ ) J 0 ( v sin θ sin α 0 ) exp [ iu cos θ 4 sin 2 ( α 0 2 ) ] sin θ ,
v = kr sin α 0 ,
u = 4 kz sin 2 ( α 0 2 ) ,
l = ( m 2 + n 2 ) 1 2 .
c ( l , s ) = 0 0 α 0 P ( θ ) J 0 ( v sin θ sin α 0 ) exp [ iu cos θ 4 sin 2 ( α 0 2 ) ] sin θ
× J 0 ( 2 πlr ) exp ( 2 πizs ) 2 πr d r dz .
c ( l , s ) = δ ( s + k k 2 l 2 ) P ( θ ) .
c ( l , s ) = δ ( s + k k 2 l 2 ) ( 1 l 2 k 2 ) 1 4 ,
c poly ( l , s ) = exp ( A ( k k 0 ) 2 ) c ( l , s ) d k .
c poly ( l , s ) = ( k 2 l 2 k ) 1 2 exp [ A ( s 2 + l 2 2 s + k 0 ) 2 ] .
f ( k ) = 1 β Γ ( ρ ) ( k α β ) ρ 1 exp ( k α β ) ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.