Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Optimizing the usable bandwidth and loss through core design in realistic hollow-core photonic bandgap fibers

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

The operational bandwidth of hollow-core photonic bandgap fibers (PBGFs) is drastically affected by interactions between the fundamental core mode and surface modes guided at the core-cladding interface. By systematically studying realistic hollow-core PBGFs we identify a new design regime robust in eliminating the presence of surface modes. We present new fiber designs with a fundamental core mode free of anticrossings with surface modes at all wavelengths within the bandgap, allowing for a low-loss operational bandwidth of ~ 17% of the central gap wavelength.

©2006 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Control of surface modes in low loss hollow-core photonic bandgap fibers

R. Amezcua-Correa, F. Gérôme, S. G. Leon-Saval, N. G. R. Broderick, T. A. Birks, and J. C. Knight
Opt. Express 16(2) 1142-1149 (2008)

Design of 7 and 19 cells core air-guiding photonic crystal fibers for low-loss, wide bandwidth and dispersion controlled operation

R. Amezcua-Correa, N. G. R. Broderick, M. N. Petrovich, F. Poletti, and D. J. Richardson
Opt. Express 15(26) 17577-17586 (2007)

The effect of core asymmetries on the polarization properties of hollow core photonic bandgap fibers

F. Poletti, N. G. R. Broderick, D. J. Richardson, and T. M. Monro
Opt. Express 13(22) 9115-9124 (2005)

Supplementary Material (1)

Media 1: AVI (312 KB)     

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (9)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) Cross section of a modeled PBGF with d/ʌ = 0.95, dc /ʌ = 0.55, dp /ʌ = 0.317 and tr /(ʌ-d) = 1, (b) geometric parameters used to define the structure.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) and (c) SEM images of hollow-core PBGFs fabricated at our facilities with compressed and expanded cores respectively. (b) and (c) modeled structures that resemble the fibers, with parameters d/ʌ = 0.95, dc /ʌ = 0.55, dp /ʌ = 0.317, normalized ring thickness T = 1, and expansion coefficient of -6.33% for (b) and +6.33% for (d).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a) Effective index of modes (blue for FM and red for SM). (b) Fraction of core-confined energy of the FM (blue) and factor F (black) of the FM vs. wavelength for a fiber with T = 1 and E = 0. Plots of the axial Poynting vector: (i), (ii), and (iii) are of the FM “far” from the anticrossing, at the anticrossing point and near the long wavelength bandgap edge respectively, and (iv) is for the SM.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (a) Fraction of core-confined energy and (b) factor F of the fundamental core mode vs. normalized ring thickness and vs. wavelength, for fibers with E = 0.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Dispersion curves of the fundamental mode (solid lines) and surface modes (dashed lines) for fibers with (a) T = 0.175 and 0.4, (b) T = 0.5, 0.6 and 0.7. Insets are mode profiles of the surface modes located by arrows. (c) Factor F of the FM vs. wavelength for fibers with T = 0.4, 0.5, 0.6 and 0.7
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. (a) Operational bandwidth normalized with respect to the central gap wavelength λc = 2.05 μm, and (b) normalized with respect to the bandgap width measured at the airline, equal to 330 nm.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. (blue) Maximum of the core-confined energy and (black) minimum F factor of the fundamental core mode vs. normalized ring thickness.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. (Movie 312 KB) The movie in (a) shows contour maps of the percentage of power in the core of the fundamental air-guided mode as the core is enlarged. Contour maps of fraction of power in the core of the FM for fibers with the (a) smallest and (b) largest core analyzed, E = ±6.33%.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9. (a) Maximum of the core-confined energy, (b) minimum Fʌ, and (c) operational bandwidth normalized with respect to the center of the bandgap λc = 2.05 μm vs. normalized core thickness for E = ±6.33%,±3.16% and 0.

Equations (3)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

E = Rc 2 ʌ ʌ d 2 1
T = t r ʌ d
F = ( ε 0 μ 0 ) 1 / 2 holeperimeters dl E 2 cross sec tion dA E × H * · Z ̂ ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.