Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Enhanced depth of field integral imaging with sensor resolution constraints

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

One of the main challenges in integral imaging is to overcome the limited depth of field. Although it is widely assumed that such limitation is mainly imposed by diffraction due to lenslet imaging, we show that the most restricting factor is the pixelated structure of the sensor (CCD). In this context, we demonstrate that by proper reduction of the fill factor of pickup microlenses, the depth of field can be substantially improved with no deterioration of lateral resolution.

©2004 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Integral imaging with improved depth of field by use of amplitude-modulated microlens arrays

Manuel Martínez-Corral, Bahram Javidi, Raúl Martínez-Cuenca, and Genaro Saavedra
Appl. Opt. 43(31) 5806-5813 (2004)

Analysis on enhanced depth of field for integral imaging microscope

Young-Tae Lim, Jae-Hyeung Park, Ki-Chul Kwon, and Nam Kim
Opt. Express 20(21) 23480-23488 (2012)

Depth of field and resolution-enhanced integral imaging display system

Xiao-Li Ma, Han-Le Zhang, Rong-Ying Yuan, Tong-Yu Wang, Min-Yang He, Yan Xing, and Qiong-Hua Wang
Opt. Express 30(25) 44580-44593 (2022)

Supplementary Material (2)

Media 1: GIF (333 KB)     
Media 2: GIF (632 KB)     

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Scheme, not to scale, of the capture setup of a 3D IIS. The field lens collects the rays from the outermost microlenses, the camera lens projects the images onto the CCD.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) Grey-scale representation of Eq. (4). Any cross-sections correspond to the spot produced by an object point at a depth z. White lines delimit the back-projected pixel size. The effect of defocus is much more appreciable for positive values of z; (b) Spot diameter for different values of the fill factor. The black thick line is used to mark the back-projected pixel size.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a) Synthetic object; (b) 2D elemental images captured from 49 views; (c) Enlarged view of the central image. The object was placed at z=0 and the fill factor was set at ϕ/p=1.0
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (a) 2D elemental images of the object captured from 49 different views; (b) Enlarged view of the central image. The object was placed at z=0 and the fill factor was set at ϕ/p=0.5.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Central elemental image as the object is displaced from z=0 to z=67.5 mm. Left-hand image corresponds to ϕ/p=0.5. Right-hand one to ϕ/p=1.0 (Video file of 0.33 Mb).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Evolution of the reconstructed image as the object is displace from z=0 to z=67.5 mm. Left-hand image corresponds to ϕ/p=0.5. Right-hand one to ϕ/p=1.0 (Video file of 0.63 Mb).

Equations (5)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

H ( x ' ; x , z ) = m exp { i π m p x 2 λ ( a z ) } P z ( x o ) exp { i 2 π x o x ' + [ M z ( m p x ) m p ] λ g d 2 x o } 2 ,
P z ( x o ) = p ( x o ) exp { i π z λ a ( a z ) x o 2 } .
H ( x ' , x , z ) = P ˜ z ( x ' λ g ) 2 m δ { x ' [ m p ( 1 M z ) M z x ] } .
H o r z = 0 ϕ 2 p ( r o ) exp { i π λ z a ( a z ) r o 2 } J o ( 2 π r r o λ g ) r o d r o 2 ,
0 D 2 H o r z r dr = 0.84 0 H o r z r dr .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.