Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Planar corner-cut square microcavities: ray optics and FDTD analysis

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We analyze corner-cut square microcavities as alternative planar microcavities. Ray tracing shows open-ray orbits that are 90°-rotated can oscillate between each other upon reflections at the 45° corner-cut facets, and have the same sense of circulation. Our two-dimensional finite-difference time-domain simulations suggest that a waveguide-coupled corner-cut square microcavity with an optimum cut size supports traveling-wave resonances with desirable add-drop filter responses. The mode-field pattern evolutions confirm the concept of modal oscillations. By applying Fourier transform on the mode-field patterns, we analyze the modal composition in k-space. The add-drop filter responses can be optimized by fine-tuning the waveguide width.

©2004 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Fabrication and characterization of optimized corner-cut square microresonators

Elton Marchena, Shouyuan Shi, and Dennis Prather
Opt. Express 16(21) 16516-16522 (2008)

Waveguide-coupled octagonal microdisk channel add–drop filters

Chao Li, Ning Ma, and Andrew W. Poon
Opt. Lett. 29(5) 471-473 (2004)

Mode field patterns and preferential mode coupling in planar waveguide-coupled square microcavities

Chung Yan Fong and Andrew W. Poon
Opt. Express 11(22) 2897-2904 (2003)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (10)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Ray tracing in a 45°-corner-cut square microcavity with cavity size of a and cut size of (a), (b) 0.1 a, and (c), (d) 0.15 a. The wavefront-matched 4-bounce open-ray orbits (red solid) in (a) and (c) have the same θ = tan-1 (8/7) = 48.81°, assuming a (mx, my) = (7, 8) mode. The ray (blue dashed) is partially reflected from the cut facet and partially transmitted (gray dashed). The wavefront-matched 4-bounce open-ray orbits (blue solid) in (b) and (d) are reflected from the cut facet. The ray orbits have an incidence angle of 90°-θ = 41.19°, corresponding to a (mx, my) = (8, 7) mode, and preserve the same sense of circulation prior to the reflection.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Schematic of a planar parallel waveguide-coupled corner-cut square microcavity channel add-drop filter.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. FDTD simulated TM-polarized throughput (blue solid), drop (red dashed) and add (green dotted) spectra of parallel waveguide-coupled corner-cut square microcavity. a = 2.2 μm, c = (a) 0 μm, (b) 0.1 μm, (c) 0.2 μm, (d) 0.3 μm, and (e) 0.4 μm. w = 0.2 μm and g = 0.2 μm. Insets show the device schematics. We identified mode A0 as (6, 9) and mode B0 as (7, 8).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Analysis of the add-drop filter performance for modes B0 - B4 as a function of the cut size. (a) Drop/add ratio and on/off ratio. (b) Coupling efficiency and Q.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. (a) FDTD simulated steady-state electric-field pattern of mode A1. We denote the mode field pattern as (mx, my) = (6, 9). (b) Fourier transform (FT) of the cavity mode-field pattern. Zoom-in view shows the FT peak is shifted from the mode (6, 9).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. FDTD simulated steady-state electric-field pattern evolution of mode B1. Field patterns are taken at time (a) t = t0, (b) t ≈ t0 + T/8, (c) t ≈ t0 + T/4, (d) t ≈ t0 + 3T/8 and (e) t ≈ t0 + T/2. t0 is an arbitrary time and T is the period. We denote (a), (e) as (7, 8) mode and (c) as (8, 7) mode.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. Fourier transform of mode B1 field patterns at (a) t = t0 and (b) t ≈ t0+T/4.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. FDTD simulated steady-state electric-field pattern of mode B2. The pattern is vortex-like and travels in a clockwise manner. (a) t = t0, (b) t ≈ t0 + T/8, (c) t ≈ t0 + T/4, (d) t ≈ t0 + 3T/8, and (e) t ≈ t0 + T/2. The dashed lines represent a wavefront traveling in the near 45° direction.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9. Fourier transform of mode B2 field pattern at (a) t = t0 and (b) t ≈ t0+T/4.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 10. FDTD-simulated TM-polarized spectra of a parallel waveguide-coupled corner-cut square microcavity of w = (a) 0.1 μm, (b) 0.15 μm, and (c) 0.25 μm. c = 0.2 μm, a = 2.2 μm and g = 0.2 μm. Throughput (solid blue), drop (dashed red) and add (dashed green).
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.