Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Evolution of electromagnetic interference through nano-metallic double-slit

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We investigated the characteristics of the near- and far-field regions of the interference for nano-metallic double-slits using a two-dimensional finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. We have found that the patterns in the near-field region have a phase difference of π with respect to those in the far-field region. A boundary, which separates the interference patterns of the two regions exists as a half circle and grows as the distance between the two slits increase. It is also found that evanescent waves can be enhanced and confined by coating the double-slit with a dielectric cladding.

©2004 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Transmission of light through slit apertures in metallic films

Yong Xie, Armis R. Zakharian, Jerome V. Moloney, and Masud Mansuripur
Opt. Express 12(25) 6106-6121 (2004)

Near- to far-field imaging of phase evolution of light emanating from a metal nanoslit

Yun Suk Jung, Yonggang Xi, Jeff Wuenschell, and Hong Koo Kim
Opt. Express 16(23) 18881-18888 (2008)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (8)

Fig.1.
Fig.1. Schematics of modeled space of a nano-metallic double-slit. Soft source is used for the illumination.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Intensity distribution of the two-dimensional simulation when the slit width is a=50nm and slit thickness is t=20 nm. (a) Shaded display of TMz mode intensity distribution when the distance between two slits; d=1µm. (b) Line profile of (a). (c) Shaded display of TEz mode intensity distribution when the distance between two slits is d=1µm. (d) Line profile of (c). Solid line represents the line profile just above the metal/air interface, dashed line is the line profile of x=50 nm, and dotted line represents the line profile of x=1µm. The insets of (b) and (d) are the magnifications of dotted and dashed line profiles.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Interference patterns in near-field and far-field regions when d=1µm and λ=620 nm: (a) Intensity distribution from the entrance of the two slits, (b) Magnified intensity distribution of the region between the two slits after the metal/air interface, (c) contour display of (b), (d) far-field interference pattern.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Electric field distribution when d=1µm and t=200 nm: (a) amplitude distribution of Ex (x component of electric field), (b) line profile of (a) at the metal/air interface, (c) Ey distribution, and (d) line profile of (c).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Intensity distribution with various distances between two slits: (a) d=250 nm, (b) d=2 µm, (c) magnified display of the region between two slits when d=2 µm, and (d) magnified display of the region between two slits when d=5 µm.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Interference patterns with various conditions are presented. (a) and (b) correspond to the results when one of the slits is filled with silicon nitride (n=2) to introduce phase difference resulting in a phase shift of π. (c) Interference pattern with three slits. (d) Interference between slits of different widths.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. Intensity distribution with various slit intervals for a cladding thickness of 50 nm: (a) d=2 µm, (b) magnified display of the region between the two slits.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. Line profiles of the intensity distribution along the y direction when (a) l=20 nm, (b) l=50 nm, (c) l=100 nm, and (d) l=200 nm.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.