Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Simple model of errors in chirped fiber gratings

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A simple etalon based model is presented to show the origin of the wavelength-dependent ripples in the group delay and phase, and in the intensity of optical signals reflected from chirped fiber gratings. The simplicity of the model allows intuitive understanding of the effects, and quantitative predictions. We derive accurate scaling laws that allow the experimenter to make quantitative connections between the grating writing process parameters and grating performance.

©2004 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Reduction of group delay ripple of multi-channel chirped fiber gratings using adiabatic UV correction

P. I. Reyes, M. Sumetsky, N. M. Litchinitser, and P. S. Westbrook
Opt. Express 12(12) 2676-2687 (2004)

Polarization mode dispersion in chirped fiber Bragg gratings

Ding Wang, Michael R. Matthews, and James F. Brennan III
Opt. Express 12(23) 5741-5753 (2004)

Group-delay ripple correction in chirped fiber Bragg gratings

M. Sumetsky, P. I. Reyes, P. S. Westbrook, N. M. Litchinitser, B. J. Eggleton, Y. Li, R. Deshmukh, and C. Soccolich
Opt. Lett. 28(10) 777-779 (2003)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) Reflection spectrum of a grating written with intentional periodic errors to generate sidebands. (b) The GDR and phase ripple of the same grating, measured from the long wavelength side.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (left) Diagram of reflections to first order in sideband strength. Light enters from the right (E 0) and is reflected from the grating at various points. The highlighted regions of the fiber grating A,B,C represent the near sideband, main band, and far sideband respectively, for a particular wavelength. (right) Time domain representation of a single pulse after reflection from the band structure, showing early and late echoes.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Peak to peak phase ripple versus relative sideband size for two different grating strengths. Lines show sideband model and points show CM simulation. Right axis is peak-to-peak GDR for the given phase ripple based on a grating with C 0=0.079 nm/cm and sideband spacing Δλ=0.72 nm.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Peak to peak GDR versus grating strength. Line is from Eq. (7). Solid points are data from gratings as shown in Fig.1. Open points are the same gratings after annealing.

Equations (18)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

n ( z ) = n 0 + Δ n ( z ) 2 ( 1 + m ( z ) ) cos ( p ( z ) z + ϕ ( z ) )
m ( z ) = ( W ( g ) cos gz + X ( g ) sin gz ) dg
ϕ ( z ) = ( Y ( g ) cos gz + Z ( g ) sin gz ) dg
n ( z ) = n 0 + Δ n 2 Re [ e ipz + 1 2 ( N + ( g ) e i ( p + g ) g + N ( g ) e i ( p g ) z ) dg ]
E r ( k , t ) = e i φ ( AE 0 ( t τ ) + BE 0 ( t ) + ( AB 2 + C ( 1 B 2 ) ) E 0 ( t + τ ) + O ( A 2 , B 2 , AB ) )
A f Re ( N + ( g ) ) Δ n ( k g 2 n 0 ) 4
B f [ Δ n ( k ) 2 ]
C f Re ( N ( g ) ) Δ n ( k + g 2 n 0 ) 4
I = E r * E r ( B 2 + 2 B ( A + C ) ( 1 B 2 ) cos ( ϕ ) ) E 0 2
α = tan 1 Im ( E r ) Re ( E r ) φ ( 1 + B 2 ) A B sin ( ϕ ) + C B ( 1 B 2 ) sin ( ϕ ) .
Δ τ = 2 nL c ( ( 1 + B 2 ) A B + ( 1 B 2 ) C B ) cos ( 2 knL )
γ = Δ n sb Δ n mb = A tanh 1 B .
n ( z ) = n 0 + Δ n ( z ) 2 cos ( p ( z ) z ) + η ( z )
p eff ( z ) = p ( z ) ( 1 + η ( z ) n 0 ) .
n eff ( z ) n 0 + Δ n ( z ) 2 cos ( p ( z ) z + p 0 n 0 0 z η ( x ) dx ) .
n eff ( z ) = n 0 + Δ n ( z ) 2 cos ( p ( z ) z ) + Δ n ( z ) 4 p 0 δ n g n 0 [ cos ( ( p ( z ) + g ) z ) cos ( ( p ( z ) g ) z ) ]
A , C = 1 2 p 0 g δ n n 0 tanh 1 ( B )
l tr = 2 π g tr = λ 2 2 nc τ C 0 .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.