Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Polarization splitter/combiner in high index contrast Bragg reflector waveguides

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Novel designs of polarization devices based on Bragg reflector waveguides in a high index contrast silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform have been proposed. Brewster angle condition is incorporated in the periodic structures. Numerical simulations with a 3D semivectorial beam propagation method demonstrate the device performance as TE mode polarizer with high TE to TM extinction ratio and TE/TM mode polarization splitter and combiner with high polarization splitting efficiency.

©2003 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Ultracompact high-efficiency polarizing beam splitter with a hybrid photonic crystal and conventional waveguide structure

Seunghyun Kim, Gregory P. Nordin, Jingbo Cai, and Jianhua Jiang
Opt. Lett. 28(23) 2384-2386 (2003)

Local-field engineering in slot waveguide for fabricating on-chip Bragg grating filters with high reflectivity across a flat broadband

Shengbao Wu, Yongxia Su, Lei Zhang, Xiaofei Gu, Ting Feng, Jinbiao Xiao, and X. Steve Yao
Opt. Express 32(3) 4684-4697 (2024)

Design of miniaturized silicon wire and slot waveguide polarization splitter based on a resonant tunneling

Masa-aki Komatsu, Kunimasa Saitoh, and Masanori Koshiba
Opt. Express 17(21) 19225-19234 (2009)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Design structure of the Bragg reflector waveguide for TE polarizer. Si nhigh =3.476, Si 3 N 4 nlow =1.99, Si O 2 n Si O 2 = 1.5 , dhigh =0.37 µm, dlow =1.14 µm, dcore =6.1 µm, ncore =nlow =1.99 (non-depressed core) or ncore =1.8 (depressed core), height of Si substrate hSi =1µm, SiO2 height h Si O 2 = 1 μm , height of Bragg reflectors region hcore =2.2 µm and hair =1.4 µm air.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Power in TE (triangles) and TM (dots) modes versus propagation distance in the Bragg reflector waveguide with depressed index core for two and five periods.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Power in TE (triangles) and TM (dots) modes versus propagation distance in the Bragg reflector waveguide with non-depressed index core for two and five periods.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Asymmetric structure of coupled Bragg reflector waveguides for polarization splitting/combining. Parameters are the same as given in Fig. 1.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. TE mode distribution versus propagation distance in the waveguides in Fig 4. Light is launched in the upper core.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. TM mode distribution versus propagation distance in the waveguides in Fig 4. Light is launched in the upper core.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. Power in TE (triangles) and TM (dots) modes from Figs. 5 and 6 versus propagation distance in the coupled waveguides.

Equations (3)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

d high = ( 2 k + 1 ) λ 4 ( n high 2 + n low 2 ) 1 2 n high 2 ; d low = ( 2 l + 1 ) λ 4 ( n high 2 + n low 2 ) 1 2 n low 2 , k , l = 0 , 1 , 2 , ,
d core = m λ 2 1 ( n core 2 n eff 2 ) 1 2 , m = 1 , 2 , , .
n eff = n high n low ( n high 2 + n low 2 ) 1 2 and n eff n core n low .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.