Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

High bit-rate combined FSK/IM modulated optical signal generation by using GCSR tunable laser sources

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We report on the generation of combined FSK/IM modulation format by using GCSR tunable laser sources. FSK modulation, up to 100 Mbit/s, has been achieved by modulating the phase section of a GCSR laser source. We experimentally demonstrate generation of combined FSK/IM modulation at 100Mbit/s and 10 Gbit/s, respectively. We also report on successful FSK label insertion using a SOA-MZI wavelength converter.

©2003 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Asynchronous, self-controlled, all-optical label and payload separator using nonlinear polarization rotation in a semiconductor optical amplifier

J.J. Vegas Olmos, I. Tafur Monroy, Y. Liu, M. Garcia Larrode, J. Turkiewicz, H.J.S. Dorren, and A.M.J. Koonen
Opt. Express 12(18) 4214-4219 (2004)

All-optical modulation format conversion from frequency-shift-keying to phase-shift-keying

Tetsuya Kawanishi, Takahide Sakamoto, and Masayuki Izutsu
Opt. Express 13(20) 8038-8044 (2005)

High-speed optical DQPSK and FSK modulation using integrated Mach-Zehnder interferometers

Tetsuya Kawanishi, Takahide Sakamoto, Tetsuya Miyazaki, Masayuki Izutsu, Takahisa Fujita, Shingo Mori, Kaoru Higuma, and Junichiro Ichikawa
Opt. Express 14(10) 4469-4478 (2006)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. General overview of the Optical Label Switching (OLS) network architecture.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. FSK optical signal with a modulation rate of 50 Mbit/s (a), 78 Mbit/s (b), 120 Mbit/s (c) and 155 Mbit/s (d).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. The experimental setup for FSK/IM generation and label insertion (a), where we can observe the recovered FSK signal (b) and the recovered eye patterns (c).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Comparison of the BER versus the receiver sensibility for the FSK and the IM signal after and before the wavelength converter.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.