Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Emulation of dual-conjugate adaptive optics on an 8-m class telescope

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

In this article we present a downscaled laboratory setup emulating five natural guide stars, a layered static atmosphere and a 7.5-m aperture telescope equipped with dual-conjugate adaptive optics at a wavelength of 2.2 µm. Three reconstruction alternatives were evaluated; conventional adaptive optics, field-averaged conventional adaptive optics and dual-conjugate adaptive optics. The results were compared with Zemax-simulations of the setup. The expected increase of the size of the isoplanatic patch, using dual-conjugate adaptive optics, was confirmed.

©2003 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Dual-conjugate adaptive optics for wide-field high-resolution retinal imaging

Jörgen Thaung, Per Knutsson, Zoran Popovic, and Mette Owner-Petersen
Opt. Express 17(6) 4454-4467 (2009)

Numerical simulations of multiconjugate adaptive optics wave-front reconstruction on giant telescopes

Brent L. Ellerbroek, Luc Gilles, and Curtis R. Vogel
Appl. Opt. 42(24) 4811-4818 (2003)

Preconditioned conjugate gradient wave-front reconstructors for multiconjugate adaptive optics

Luc Gilles, Brent L. Ellerbroek, and Curtis R. Vogel
Appl. Opt. 42(26) 5233-5250 (2003)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Schematic birds eye view of the optical setup, with rays originating from the central GS.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. a) Sample of optical path difference from PS2 given in radians, with distance r scaled to parent version. b) Obtained structure function DΦ from PS2, averaging over 10 measurements (blue) compared to the Kolmogorov structure function DΦ=k·r5/3 (green).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Average PSFs from the experiment. Case a) is uncorrected, b) is corrected with conventional AO, c) is field averaged conventional AO and d) is dual-conjugate AO. The intensity IN is normalised with the central intensity of the diffraction-limited PSF. The axes of the PSFs are the relative coordinates in arc seconds, scaled to the parent version.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Comparison of the experimental results with a Zemax model of the experiment. The black curves depict the Strehl ratio as function of angle, α, from the central guide star in the parent experiment with error intervals marked in green or blue. The red dots are the experimental values including error bars. Case a) is uncorrected, b) is corrected with conventional AO, c) is field averaged conventional AO and d) is dual-conjugate AO. The green families resulted from running the optimization routine a single time, and the blue family resulted from running it 10 times. See text for more explanation.

Tables (2)

Tables Icon

Table 1. Scaling of the atmosphere in the experiment

Tables Icon

Table 2. Key parameters for the experiment, and scaled to parent version.

Equations (5)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

α exp = C · α par .
σ α 2 = 0.364 λ 2 D 1 3 r 0 5 3 ,
s = G c ,
[ s 1 s 2 s 3 s 4 s 5 ] = G [ c 1 c 2 ] , where G = [ s 1 c 1 s 1 c 2 s 2 c 1 s 2 c 2 s 3 c 1 s 3 c 2 s 4 c 1 s 4 c 2 s 5 c 1 s 5 c 2 ] .
β par = f L 1 f L 2 λ par λ exp D exp D par β exp ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.