Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Estimation of thermal fracture limits in quasi-continuous-wave end-pumped lasers through a time-dependent analytical model

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A time-dependent analytical thermal model of the temperature and the corresponding induced thermal stresses on the pump face of quasi-continuous wave (qcw) end-pumped laser rods is derived. We apply the model to qcw diode-end-pumped rods and show the maximum peak pump power that can be utilized without fracturing the rod. To illustrate an application of the model, it is applied to a qcw pumped Tm:YLF rod and found to be in very good agreement with published experimental results.The results indicate new criteria to avoid fracture when operating Tm:YLF rods at low qcw pump duty cycles.

©2008 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Analytical investigation on transient thermal effects in pulse end-pumped short-length fiber laser

T. Liu, Z. M. Yang, and S. H. Xu
Opt. Express 17(15) 12875-12890 (2009)

Optical distortion in end-pumped solid-state rod lasers

S. B. Sutton and G. F. Albrecht
Appl. Opt. 32(27) 5256-5269 (1993)

Thermal conductivity measurements of laser crystals by infrared thermography. Application to Nd:doped crystals

Julien Didierjean, Emilie Herault, François Balembois, and Patrick Georges
Opt. Express 16(12) 8995-9010 (2008)

Supplementary Material (2)

Media 1: MOV (754 KB)     
Media 2: MOV (329 KB)     

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. An example of a measured top-hat transverse intensity profile produced by a fibre coupled diode laser pump (own experimental results).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. The analytically (red) and numerically (black) predicted temperature in the centre of the Tm:YLF rod as a function of time while the rod is subjected to a qcw pump with a peak power of (a) 200 W at 10 Hz (τon =10 ms) and, (b) 90 W at 50 Hz (τon =10 ms).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. The maximum stress on the pump face of the Tm:YLF rod as a function of time while the rod is subjected to a qcw pump with a peak power of (a) 200 W at 10 Hz (τon = 10 ms), and (b) 90 W at 50 Hz (τon = 10 ms). The analytical (red) and numerical (black) solutions are shown.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (0.75 MB and 0.33 MB respectively) Animations of (a) the analytical stress distribution on the pump face [Media 1] and (b) the numerical stress distribution in volume of the Tm:YLF rod while it is subjected to a 90 W peak power qcw pump beam at 50 Hz (τon = 10 ms) [Media 2].
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. (a). The average pump power (as a fraction of the cw fracture power Pcw ) at which fracture of the Tm:YLF rod occurs as a function of qcw pump duty cycle (τon =10 ms). The green shaded region indicates the average pump power at which the Tm:YLF rod can be pumped without fracturing according to the analytical model. The yellow shaded region indicates the difference between the analytical model and Pcw . (b) The same notation as in (a) but for the peak pump power (in units of Pcw ) at which fracture of the Tm:YLF rod occurs as a function of qcw pump duty cycle.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1. Parameter values of the pumped Tm:YLF rod that were implemented in the simulations.

Equations (13)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

u ( r , t ) t D 2 u ( r , t ) = Q ( r , t ) ,
u ( r , t ) = 0 t 0 R Q ( ξ , τ ) G ( r , ξ , t τ ) dξdτ ,
G ( r , ξ , t ) = m = 1 2 ξ R 2 J 1 2 ( μ m ) J 0 ( μ m r R ) J 0 ( μ m r R ) exp ( D μ m 2 t R 2 ) .
Q r t = { αηE π w 2 ρ C p τ on 0 ; nT t nT + τ on ; nT + τ on t ( n + 1 ) T ,
u ( r , pT + t ) = 2 αηER kπw τ on m = 1 J 0 ( μ m r R ) J 1 ( μ m w R ) f ( p , t , μ m ) μ m 3 J 1 2 ( μ m ) ,
f ( p , t , μ m ) = exp ( μ m 2 t τ D ) { [ exp ( μ m 2 τ on τ D ) 1 ] [ exp ( μ m 2 pT τ D ) 1 ] 1 exp ( μ m 2 T τ D ) - [ 1 exp ( μ m 2 τ τ D ) ] } ,
σ r ( r , t ) = c [ 1 R 2 0 R u ( r , t ) rdr 1 r 2 0 r u ( r , t ) rdr ] ;
σ θ ( r , t ) = C [ 1 R 2 0 R u ( r , t ) rdr + 1 r 2 0 r u ( r , t ) rdr u ( r , t ) ] ,
σ r ( r , pT + t ) = 2 CαηER kπw τ on m = 1 J 1 ( μ m w R ) μ m 3 J 1 2 ( μ m ) [ J 1 ( μ m ) μ m - R J 1 ( μ m r R ) m ] f ( p , t , μ m ) ;
σ θ ( r , pT + t ) = 2 CαηER kπw τ on m = 1 J 1 ( μ m w R ) μ m 3 J 1 2 ( μ m ) [ J 1 ( μ m ) μ m + R J 1 ( μ m r R ) m J 0 ( μ m r R ) ] f ( p , t , μ m ) .
σ T ( r , pT + t ) = σ θ σ r
= 2 CαηER kπw τ on m = 1 J 1 ( μ m w R ) μ m 3 J 1 2 ( μ m ) J 2 ( μ m r R ) f ( p , t , μ m ) ,
P av P cw .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.